"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
12/21/2017 at 11:33 • Filed to: None
7
4|
"sm70- why not Duesenberg?" (sm70-whynotduesenberg)
12/21/2017 at 11:33 • Filed to: None | 7
| 4 |
But close enough.
benjrblant
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
12/21/2017 at 11:39 |
|
It must take some serious dedication to maintain and preserve such a poorly built car. It looks goofy as hell and I love it.
SpeedSix
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
12/21/2017 at 12:14 |
|
Yes! A ’77 Pacer wagon like that would be my choice if I were to seek a Pacer to own - the wagon style is a bit less dumpy, and the ’78 facelift just made it look uglier.
Recovering Gaijin
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
12/21/2017 at 12:29 |
|
>flashback alert<
‘76-ish Dad rented a Pacer to drive from Iowa City to Kalamazoo MI after the Ark(‘50-something Ford wagon) and Hudson proved untenable. He always did road trips overnight so I & my sis would sleep. I remember laying on my back under that huge glass watching the stars as he drove thru the night. Beautiful.
Thanks for the memory! Carry on.
punkgoose17
> sm70- why not Duesenberg?
12/21/2017 at 12:43 |
|
This is #10 on my cars to own list.